Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Nakisa Lease Administration · September 2026 Edition
Nakisa · 1 category · Ranked

Nakisa Lease Administration

55Judge labels
10First choices
7Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Lease accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nakisa Lease Administration for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Lease accountingAccounting and close0%17 of 609%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nakisa Lease Administration yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nakisa Lease Administration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash02114
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels3
Paraphrase9 labels6
Comparative16 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative7 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“reports only under IFRS 16 (no US GAAP), you may want to also look at Nakisa or Trimble” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“It is expensive and overkill for SMBs, but unbeatable for global ERP-heavy giants.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Nakisa → best for large enterprises consolidating many entities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Nakisa if you expect more complex global lease workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“only if you anticipate heavy global/multi-entity needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nakisa Lease Administration, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nakisa Lease Administration was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Visual Lease43 of 553Not in the top three
FinQuery41 of 5511Not in the top three
MRI ProLease32 of 552Not in the top three
LeaseAccelerator28 of 552Not in the top three
Trullion23 of 551Not in the top three
Black Owl Systems17 of 551Not in the top three
EZLease14 of 553Not in the top three
CoStar Real Estate Manager11 of 550Not in the top three
Accruent Lucernex10 of 550Not in the top three
NetLease10 of 550Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nakisa Lease Administration. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 55 answers that named Nakisa Lease Administration and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com38
debtbook.com33
blackowlsystems.com32
gartner.com29
capterra.com27
guideflow.com24
trullion.com24
nakisa.comYour site23
worldmetrics.org23
acquisition-international.com22

252 of the 275 domain citations in answers naming Nakisa Lease Administration came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Nakisa Lease Administration

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nakisa Lease Administration; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nakisa 8Nakisa Lease Accounting 1SAP Lease Accounting by Nakisa 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nakisa Lease Administration's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nakisa Lease Administration, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nakisa.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack