Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › MRI ProLease · September 2026 Edition
MRI · 1 category · Ranked

MRI ProLease

54Judge labels
3First choices
6Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Lease accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 14 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 19 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MRI ProLease for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Lease accountingAccounting and close0%14 of 605%19accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MRI ProLease yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MRI ProLease across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small01304
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative19 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels3
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best choice for mixed portfolios (real estate + equipment) across countries with complex local GAAP requirements” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose MRI ProLease if you are in Commercial Real Estate and need complex landlord billing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“For large real estate portfolios: Visual Lease or MRI ProLease.” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“MRI ProLease → best for mixed real‑estate and equipment portfolios.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Enterprise Real Estate Management Software if you are a "Finance-Only" team ... notoriously expensive, complex, and will overwhelm a pure accounting department” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MRI ProLease, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MRI ProLease was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Visual Lease43 of 524Not in the top three
FinQuery34 of 5218Not in the top three
Nakisa Lease Administration32 of 526Not in the top three
LeaseAccelerator29 of 524Not in the top three
Trullion24 of 522Not in the top three
Black Owl Systems17 of 520Not in the top three
EZLease14 of 521Not in the top three
CoStar Real Estate Manager14 of 520Not in the top three
NetLease13 of 521Not in the top three
BlackLine Lease Accounting10 of 523Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MRI ProLease. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 52 answers that named MRI ProLease and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com38
debtbook.com33
blackowlsystems.com31
guideflow.com27
gartner.com26
acquisition-international.com24
worldmetrics.org24
trullion.com22
capterra.com21
g2.com19

265 of the 265 domain citations in answers naming MRI ProLease came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MRI ProLease

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MRI ProLease; a claim can dispute any of them.
MRI 1MRI Lease Accounting (ProLease) 1MRI Lease Accounting / ProLease 1MRI Software 1ProLease 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MRI ProLease's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MRI ProLease, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mrisoftware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack