Every category where a model named LeaseAccelerator for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	20 of 60	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LeaseAccelerator yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LeaseAccelerator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels2

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels3

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“suitable for global manufacturers with a large number of equipment leases and multiple GAAPs” Llama 4 Maverick · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“LeaseAccelerator handles massive global portfolios” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users consistently complain about system speed and performance lag ... workflows are highly complex and carry a steep learning curve” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LeaseAccelerator, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeaseAccelerator was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visual Lease37 of 523Not in the top three

MRI ProLease29 of 522Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration28 of 528Not in the top three

FinQuery25 of 527Not in the top three

Trullion22 of 521Not in the top three

Black Owl Systems16 of 521Not in the top three

CoStar Real Estate Manager11 of 520Not in the top three

EZLease10 of 524Not in the top three

NetLease10 of 521Not in the top three

BlackLine Lease Accounting7 of 522Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeaseAccelerator. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 52 answers that named LeaseAccelerator and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com35

acquisition-international.com29

blackowlsystems.com29

debtbook.com28

guideflow.com27

gartner.com23

worldmetrics.org19

capterra.com18

trullion.com18

g2.com17

243 of the 243 domain citations in answers naming LeaseAccelerator came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software35

acquisition-international.com/best-lease-accounting-software-of-2026-from-compliance-to-ca29

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software28

guideflow.com/blog/lease-accounting-software26

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software23

blackowlsystems.com/best-enterprise-lease-accounting-software21

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared16

impakter.com/best-lease-accounting-software16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeaseAccelerator's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeaseAccelerator, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leaseaccelerator.ca is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.