Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › iLeaseXpress · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

iLeaseXpress

11Judge labels
7First choices
0Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Lease accounting for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 60 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named iLeaseXpress for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Lease accountingAccounting and close8%5 of 600%5under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for iLeaseXpress yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated iLeaseXpress across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels5
Scale-constrained2 labels2
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for the $99/month tier ... Best for: Companies with under ~15\u201320 leases needing a simple, affordable cloud tool with full ASC 842 compliance.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have 5 or fewer, iLeasePro's Free Plan is the best starting point for US GAAP.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most budget-friendly options, iLeaseXpress and iLeasePro are excellent choices” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“the best option is iLeaseXpress” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as iLeaseXpress, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iLeaseXpress was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Crunchafi7 of 111Not in the top three
EZLease6 of 111Not in the top three
LeaseGuru5 of 111Not in the top three
iLeasePro4 of 110Not in the top three
NetLease3 of 111Not in the top three
FinQuery3 of 110Not in the top three
Visual Lease3 of 110Not in the top three
Xero3 of 110Not in the top three
Cradle2 of 110Not in the top three
Microsoft Excel2 of 110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iLeaseXpress. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 11 answers that named iLeaseXpress and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as iLeaseXpress

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iLeaseXpress; a claim can dispute any of them.
iLeaseXpress (by iLeasePro) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iLeaseXpress's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iLeaseXpress, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack