Every category where a model named LeaseGuru for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	6%	7 of 60	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LeaseGuru yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LeaseGuru across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase3 labels2

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels6

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for FREE entry ... Free plan: covers up to 2 leases ... free forever.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have 1-2 leases: Start with LeaseGuru (completely free)” Kimi K2 · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice

“best value pick is usually LeaseGuru powered by FinQuery” GPT-5.4 mini · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice

“Designed for small lease portfolios, producing required amortization schedules and disclosures for ASC 842 or IFRS 16 compliance.” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LeaseGuru, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeaseGuru was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

iLeasePro9 of 184Not in the top three

EZLease8 of 181Not in the top three

Crunchafi8 of 180Not in the top three

NetLease6 of 181Not in the top three

iLeaseXpress5 of 182Not in the top three

FinQuery5 of 180Not in the top three

Trullion4 of 180Not in the top three

Visual Lease4 of 180Not in the top three

Cradle2 of 180Not in the top three

LeaseCrunch2 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeaseGuru. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 18 answers that named LeaseGuru and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com14

softwareconnect.com12

finquery.com10

getapp.com10

leaseabstractors.com9

capterra.com8

ileasepro.com8

blackowlsystems.com7

gartner.com7

netgain.tech7

Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming LeaseGuru came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getapp.com/finance-accounting-software/lease-accounting/org/small-business10

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software10

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-management-software9

finquery.com/lease-accounting-software7

g2.com/categories/lease-accounting/small-business7

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software7

g2.com/products/leaseguru-powered-by-finquery/pricing6

netgain.tech/blog/best-lease-accounting-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as LeaseGuru

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LeaseGuru; a claim can dispute any of them.

FinQuery LeaseGuru (formerly LeaseQuery) 1LeaseGuru by FinQuery 1LeaseGuru powered by FinQuery 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeaseGuru's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeaseGuru, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leaseguru.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.