Every category where a model named CoStar Real Estate Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	47 of 60	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoStar Real Estate Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoStar Real Estate Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Insufficient automation, limited reporting, and poor integration with finance systems... Steer clear of tools that have been widely replaced or discontinued (e.g., older CoStar lease modules” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Software like MRI, CoStar, or Lucernex ... these platforms are notoriously expensive, complex, and will overwhelm a pure accounting department” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoStar Real Estate Manager, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoStar Real Estate Manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visual Lease20 of 254Not in the top three

FinQuery18 of 253Not in the top three

MRI ProLease14 of 250Not in the top three

LeaseAccelerator11 of 251Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration11 of 251Not in the top three

Black Owl Systems6 of 251Not in the top three

Trullion6 of 251Not in the top three

NetLease6 of 250Not in the top three

EZLease4 of 251Not in the top three

Crunchafi4 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoStar Real Estate Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 25 answers that named CoStar Real Estate Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

debtbook.com11

softwareconnect.com11

worldmetrics.org11

gartner.com10

blackowlsystems.com9

g2.com8

costarmanager.com7

trullion.com7

nakisa.com6

acquisition-international.com5

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming CoStar Real Estate Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software11

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software10

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software10

blackowlsystems.com/best-enterprise-lease-accounting-software6

acquisition-international.com/best-lease-accounting-software-of-2026-from-compliance-to-ca5

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared5

trullion.com/blog/lease-accounting-software-solutions-for-asc-842-ifrs-16-2026-guide5

costarmanager.com/blog/five-reasons-lease-accounting-software-systems-fail4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CoStar Real Estate Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoStar Real Estate Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.

CoStar 2CoStar Lease Accounting 1CoStar Lease Administration 1CoStar Real Estate Manager (lease accounting module) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoStar Real Estate Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoStar Real Estate Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at costarrealestatemanager.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.