Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Integral · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Integral

24Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

13 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Integral was named 8 times in Transfer pricing and 1 other category, where TPGenie led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 100

under the label threshold

Mid-market37 of 101

under the label threshold

Enterprise13 of 114

under the label threshold

In transfer pricing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Integral for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Transfer pricing	Tax and compliance	0%	37 of 101	33%	6	under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	0%	25 of 54	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Bitwave at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Integral yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Integral across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Integral is an AI-powered transfer pricing platform that helps multinational companies and accounting/advisory firms stay audit-ready” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best For: Large multinationals seeking enterprise-grade solutions” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strong candidate for mid-market and enterprise teams” MiniMax M2.5 · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“leans toward enterprise-grade needs and does not publish transparent pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · soft negative

“Many (e.g., Integral, Reptune.net, ONESOURCE) don't publish starting prices” Grok 4.1 Fast · Transfer pricing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Integral, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Integral was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cryptio11 of 242Not among the top eight

Bitwave10 of 245Not among the top eight

TPGenie8 of 243Not among the top eight

TRES Finance8 of 242Not among the top eight

Aibidia6 of 240Not among the top eight

Cryptoworth6 of 240Not among the top eight

Exactera Transfer Pricing5 of 241Not among the top eight

TaxBit5 of 241Not among the top eight

Koinly4 of 242Not among the top eight

CoinLedger4 of 241Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Integral. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Integral and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com13

itechguides.com12

sourceforge.net12

gitnux.org11

worldmetrics.org11

coinledger.io10

tres.finance10

zipdo.co9

spark.money8

techdogs.com8

104 of the 104 domain citations in answers naming Integral came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coinledger.io/tools/best-crypto-accounting-software10

g2.com/categories/transfer-pricing8

gitnux.org/best/transfer-pricing-software8

spark.money/tools/crypto-accounting-software-comparison8

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/best-crypto-accounting-software8

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cryptocurrency-accounting-software7

tres.finance/finos-crypto-accounting-software/top-5-accounting-software-for-crypto-compani7

worldmetrics.org/best/transfer-pricing-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

integral.xyz is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Integral takes 0% of first choices and TPGenie takes 30%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “transfer pricing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “transfer pricing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 90,500 a month (“integral”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 145,303 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 95 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 155 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 852
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2024, as Integral Treasury, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 37 of 101 in transfer pricing

Segment leader

30%

TPGenie

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 24 answers
Its own site cited: in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on integral.xyz

186

subdomains included

Content

139

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

14 · 25

Kind	Pages	Latest	Categories named
Blog	128	2026-01-07	Crypto accounting
Case study	5	2026-01-07
Glossary or explainer	4	2026-01-07
Template or tool	1	2026-01-07
Podcast or video	1	2026-01-07

Most recent

2026-01-07Dao taxes guide blog
2026-01-07Account level cost basis blog
2026-01-07Community round blog
2026-01-07Franklin templeton announcement blog
2026-01-07Arweave support blog
2026-01-07Acuity partnership blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page integral.xyz exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Integral

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Integral; a claim can dispute any of them.

Integral / EY Transfer Pricing Engine 1

Follow Integral

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Integral is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The web3 CFO's most powerful tool. Enterprise-grade crypto accounting software that puts you in control. Crypto treasury management, tax calculations and bookkeeping.
integral.xyz
For: web3 CFO's
integral.xyz
Integrations claimed: 10 integral.xyz/case-studies · 30 integral.xyz/integrations pages disagree
Customers named: dYdXllamaOurZoraRTKFTElectricCapitalDelphi_Digitaltensor_hqprivy_io
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Integral's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: integral.xyz, integral.xyz/features/defi, integral.xyz/case-studies, integral.xyz/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Integral's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Integral, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Integral by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Integral is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Integral, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.