Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Invoicely · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Invoicely

17Judge labels
0First choices
17Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Invoicely was named 8 times in Invoicing software and 1 other category, where Wave led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Invoicely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Invoicing softwareReceivables and billing0%86 of 86100%7under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19%
Global e-invoicing complianceTax and compliance0%97 of 108100%1under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Invoicely yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Invoicely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00022
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Major data exposure in October 2025 exposed ~178,000 unencrypted files ... raising serious security risks for fraud or identity theft.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Invoicely is a legacy invoicing platform that has garnered a "Poor" rating (around 1.8/5) on Trustpilot.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools with Significant Complaints ... Invoicely - Delivery issues ... Poor support ... Billing problems” MiniMax M2.5 · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious with these invoicing tools... Invoicely: Frequent reports of poor/no customer support” Grok 4.1 Fast · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Invoicely, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoicely was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
FreshBooks13 of 171Not in the top three
Zoho Invoice10 of 172Not in the top three
Wave9 of 171Not in the top three
QuickBooks8 of 172Not in the top three
Xero7 of 171Not in the top three
Basware4 of 171Not in the top three
Invoice Simple4 of 170Not in the top three
Invoice2go4 of 170Not in the top three
Invoice Ninja3 of 170Not in the top three
Invoiced3 of 170Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invoicely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Invoicely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

trustpilot.com13
reddit.com11
capterra.com10
g2.com8
mindsprint.com7
nerdwallet.com6
softwareadvice.com6
uk.trustpilot.com6
bbb.org5
capterra.fr5

Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Invoicely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invoicely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invoicely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at invoicely.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack