Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › J.P. Morgan · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

J.P. Morgan

15Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. J.P. Morgan was named 3 times in Corporate cards, where Ramp led with 69%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business64 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market14 of 63

under the label threshold

Enterprise9 of 59

under the label threshold

In corporate cards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named J.P. Morgan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate cards	Spend and procurement	0%	14 of 63	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 69%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for J.P. Morgan yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated J.P. Morgan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look at traditional commercial cards (Amex, Chase, J.P. Morgan)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate cards · scale prompt · alternative

“banks (Citi/JPMorgan) for global enterprises” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate cards · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as J.P. Morgan, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and J.P. Morgan was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ramp12 of 155Not in the top three

Brex12 of 151Not in the top three

Citi9 of 150Not in the top three

American Express7 of 150Not in the top three

Rippling Spend7 of 150Not in the top three

BILL Spend & Expense6 of 152Not in the top three

Airwallex4 of 151Not in the top three

Rho4 of 150Not in the top three

Adyen2 of 150Not in the top three

Airbase2 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named J.P. Morgan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 15 answers that named J.P. Morgan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

nerdwallet.com6

rippling.com6

forbes.com5

jpmorgan.comYour site5

airwallex.com4

corpay.com4

rho.co4

americanexpress.com3

brex.com3

payhawk.com3

Thirty-eight of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming J.P. Morgan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

nerdwallet.com/business/credit-cards/best/corporate5

forbes.com/advisor/credit-cards/best-corporate-credit-cards4

rippling.com/blog/best-commercial-credit-cards-business4

corpay.com/resources/blog/corporate-card-providers-evaluate3

payhawk.com/ebooks/cfo-card-program-checklist3

rippling.com/blog/corporate-card-program3

airwallex.com/en-uk/blog/enterprise-global-payment-solutions2

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/compare-corporate-business-cards2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as J.P. Morgan

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as J.P. Morgan; a claim can dispute any of them.

JPMorgan 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when J.P. Morgan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as J.P. Morgan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jpmorgan.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.