Every category where a model named Lunos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash application	Receivables and billing	7%	5 of 83	0%	11	accepted challenger
Accounts receivable automation	Receivables and billing	0%	28 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Books at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lunos yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lunos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels3

Comparative13 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Pay-As-You-Go Solution: Lunos ... "I want zero monthly risk." | Lunos” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice

“Lunos (backed by GoCardless/General Catalyst) is the strongest fit for mid-market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Lunos – Best overall for a free/very low-cost start” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice

“Lunos handles the messy side of the ledger, such as when a customer pays the wrong amount or forgets to send a remittance advice” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lunos, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lunos was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HighRadius24 of 327Not in the top three

Billtrust16 of 321Not in the top three

Versapay15 of 320Not in the top three

Esker11 of 320Not in the top three

Serrala9 of 321Not in the top three

QuickBooks Payments8 of 325Not in the top three

Upflow8 of 324Not in the top three

BlackLine Cash Application7 of 320Not in the top three

Kolleno6 of 321Not in the top three

Gaviti5 of 321Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lunos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Lunos and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lunos.aiYour site32

highradius.com24

cashflowpick.com17

cashbook.com14

upflow.io13

bluecopa.com11

ledge.co10

rex.inc10

transformance.ai10

hustleandpassive.com9

118 of the 150 domain citations in answers naming Lunos came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

lunos.ai/blog/best-cash-application-software25

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools19

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide14

cashflowpick.com/cash-application-software14

upflow.io/software/best-cash-application-software11

bluecopa.com/blog/cash-application-softwares10

rex.inc/resources/comparisons/best-cash-application-software10

hustleandpassive.com/top-10-cash-management-tools9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Lunos

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lunos; a claim can dispute any of them.

Lunos AI 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lunos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lunos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lunos.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.