Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Mercury + Treasury · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Mercury + Treasury

7Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mercury + Treasury was named 2 times in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 134

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mercury + Treasury for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	2%	15 of 124	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mercury + Treasury yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mercury + Treasury across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mercury is ideal for startups and companies with at least $250K in cash” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mercury + Treasury, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mercury + Treasury was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Agicap5 of 72Not in the top three

GTreasury4 of 70Not in the top three

Kyriba4 of 70Not in the top three

Centime3 of 71Not in the top three

Rho Treasury3 of 70Not in the top three

TreasuryView2 of 70Not in the top three

Trovata2 of 70Not in the top three

Brex1 of 70Not in the top three

Brex Business/Treasury1 of 70Not in the top three

Chaser1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mercury + Treasury. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Mercury + Treasury and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com6

treasuryview.com6

aifinancetools.co5

gartner.com5

nilus.com4

centime.com3

rho.co3

agicap.com2

debtbook.com2

eco.com2

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Mercury + Treasury came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

treasuryview.com/en/blog/best-treasury-management-software-for-smbs6

aifinancetools.co/blog/best-treasury-management-tools5

g2.com/categories/treasury-management-systems/small-business5

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems5

nilus.com/blog/best-treasury-management-software4

centime.com/llm-pages/top-treasury-management-solutions3

rho.co/blog/treasury-management-software3

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mercury + Treasury

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mercury + Treasury; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mercury Treasury 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mercury + Treasury's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mercury + Treasury, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mercury.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.