Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Remitly · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Remitly

8Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Remitly was named 6 times in Cross-border payments and 1 other category, where Wise Business led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business40 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Remitly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	25 of 83	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	53 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Remitly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Remitly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“considered safe and reliable include Wise, Remitly, Revolut, OFX, XE, Western Union, and MoneyGram” Llama 4 Maverick · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · alternative

“Remitly (good for speed, balanced reviews).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Remitly, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Remitly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wise Business7 of 84Not in the top three

OFX5 of 80Not in the top three

Revolut Business5 of 80Not in the top three

MoneyGram4 of 80Not in the top three

PayPal4 of 80Not in the top three

Western Union4 of 80Not in the top three

Stripe2 of 81Not in the top three

Adyen2 of 80Not in the top three

Payoneer2 of 80Not in the top three

XE Business2 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Remitly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Remitly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sendmoneycompare.com4

airwallex.com3

bbb.org3

reddit.com3

trustpilot.com3

xtransfer.com3

bis.org2

chargeflow.io2

consumeraffairs.com2

corpay.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Remitly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sendmoneycompare.com/guides/money-transfer-safety-guide3

bis.org/pages/cpmi-cross-border-payments-programme/pietf-fraud-report-2026.pdf2

chargeflow.io/blog/cross-border-payments2

consumeraffairs.com/finance/transferwise.html2

corpay.com/resources/blog/choosing-a-new-global-payments-provider-avoiding-pitfalls-in-a-d2

guideflow.com/blog/cross-border-payments-software2

remitpathhq.com/en/guides/remittance-scams-and-safety.html2

wondergate.io/blog/cross-border-payment-fraud-prevention2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Remitly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Remitly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at remitly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.