Index › Products › NMI · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

NMI

13Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NMI was named 3 times in Embedded payments and 1 other category, where Stripe Connect led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 96

under the label threshold

Mid-market35 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprise59 of 86

under the label threshold

In embedded payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NMI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Embedded payments platforms	Receivables and billing	0%	35 of 110	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53%
Payment orchestration platforms	Receivables and billing	0%	41 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NMI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NMI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose NMI if your B2B stack is more gateway/processor-flexibility oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · Payment orchestration · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for White-Labeling” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Embedded payments · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NMI, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NMI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Connect11 of 136Not among the top eight

Finix8 of 130Not among the top eight

Adyen for Platforms7 of 132Not among the top eight

Payrix4 of 130Not among the top eight

Helcim3 of 131Not among the top eight

Tilled3 of 131Not among the top eight

Stax Connect3 of 130Not among the top eight

WePay3 of 130Not among the top eight

Adyen2 of 131Not among the top eight

Marqeta2 of 130Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NMI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named NMI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

whop.com10

guideflow.com9

fintechspecs.com7

lendflow.com7

sourceforge.net7

stripe.com7

londonlovesbusiness.com6

f6s.com5

g2.com4

zendikt.com4

No domain is on file for NMI, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

whop.com/blog/embedded-payments-platforms10

guideflow.com/blog/embedded-payments-software9

fintechspecs.com/blog/embedded-payments-providers-b2b-saas7

lendflow.com/post/best-embedded-finance-platforms7

londonlovesbusiness.com/the-10-best-embedded-payment-solutions-for-software-companies6

sourceforge.net/software/embedded-payments/for-small-business4

zendikt.com/top-10-embedded-payments-software4

emergenresearch.com/blog/top-10-companies-by-competitive-position-in-the-global-b2b-paymen3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where NMI stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 12,100 a month (“nmi”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 521 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 35 of 110 in embedded payments

Segment leader

53%

Stripe Connect

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 13 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as NMI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NMI; a claim can dispute any of them.

NMI (Net Meridian International) 1

Follow NMI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NMI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NMI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NMI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where NMI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name NMI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.