Every category where a model named Oracle Cloud EPM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	36 of 52	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	55 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Cloud EPM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Cloud EPM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Full EPM suite with deep enterprise controls | Complexity and heavier implementation” Perplexity Sonar · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“The go-to choice for companies using Oracle ERP products.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Oracle for large enterprises” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid the heavyweights (Anaplan/Oracle) unless you have very complex international operations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · scale prompt · hard negative

“they represent the highest risk of implementation failure for unprepared teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Cloud EPM, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Cloud EPM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan47 of 5217Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning43 of 524Not in the top three

OneStream40 of 525Not in the top three

Pigment30 of 528Not in the top three

Board25 of 521Not in the top three

SAP Analytics Cloud24 of 520Not in the top three

Vena22 of 521Not in the top three

Planful18 of 521Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik18 of 520Not in the top three

IBM Planning Analytics16 of 520Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Cloud EPM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 52 answers that named Oracle Cloud EPM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

board.com29

cfoshortlist.com27

getaleph.com26

financecopilothq.com23

centage.com20

drivetrain.ai17

learn.g2.com16

gartner.com15

viewpointanalysis.com15

cubesoftware.com13

201 of the 201 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Cloud EPM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software-for-enterprises23

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software22

getaleph.com/answers/top-fpa-software-202621

centage.com/blog/best-fp-a-software19

cfoshortlist.com/reports/best-fpa-software-202619

financecopilothq.com/best-fpa-software19

learn.g2.com/best-fpa-software15

viewpointanalysis.com/post/financial-planning-and-analysis-software-options-202615

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Cloud EPM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Cloud EPM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle EPM 2Oracle EPM (Hyperion) 1Oracle EPM Cloud 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Cloud EPM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Cloud EPM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.