Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 70 of 73, unchanged
Oracle Essbase
5Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Essbase was named 3 times in FP&A platforms, where Planful led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market71 of 74
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise34 of 57
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In fp&a platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Essbase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 71 of 74 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Essbase held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · FP&A platforms · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 74, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Essbase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Essbase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“generated the most negative feedback overall... Initial setup was very tough, patches are time consuming” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“the tools that generated the most negative feedback were Planful, Pigment, and Oracle Essbase” Perplexity Sonar · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Essbase, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Essbase was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Essbase, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Essbase was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Essbase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Oracle Essbase and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cubesoftware.com5
drivetrain.ai5
abacum.ai4
board.com3
datarails.com3
getaleph.com3
kepion.com3
myhospitalnow.com3
financecopilothq.com2
g2.com2
Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Oracle Essbase came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Follow Oracle Essbase
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Essbase.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Essbase.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Rapidly generate insights from data sets using what-if analysis and data visualization tools and drive smarter decisions in the cloud or on-premises with Oracle Essbase.
- For
- business users, analysts, modelers, and decision-makers across all lines of business
- Free plan or trial
- Get a free Oracle Cloud trial oracle.com/analytics/essbase
- Hosting
- the cloudon-premises
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, customers
What Oracle Essbase's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: oracle.com/analytics/essbase, oracle.com/ae/analytics/essbase, oracle.com/br/analytics/essbase, oracle.com/bz/analytics/essbase, oracle.com/cn/analytics/essbase. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Essbase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Essbase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Essbase by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Essbase is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Essbase, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.