Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Oracle Fusion · September 2026 Edition

Oracle · 3 categories · Named, not ranked

Oracle Fusion

10Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Fusion was named 5 times in Fixed asset accounting and 2 other categories, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market40 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise74 of 90

under the label threshold

In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	40 of 94	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	68 of 85	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	49 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Fusion yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Fusion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oracle Fusion (enterprise)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“not ready for the complexity or cost of enterprise-level suites like SAP Ariba or Oracle Fusion” MiniMax M2.5 · Procure-to-pay · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Ariba4 of 100Not in the top three

Coupa3 of 101Not in the top three

Asset Panda3 of 100Not in the top three

Microsoft Dynamics 3653 of 100Not in the top three

BlackLine2 of 101Not in the top three

Procurify2 of 101Not in the top three

Sage Fixed Assets2 of 101Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS2 of 101Not in the top three

Basware2 of 100Not in the top three

Precoro2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named Oracle Fusion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com5

guideflow.com4

softwareconnect.com4

worldmetrics.org4

gartner.com3

softwareadvice.com3

assetcues.com2

bassets.net2

bluecopa.com2

cfoshortlist.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-procure-to-pay-software3

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-asset-management-software3

financesonline.com/fixed-asset-management2

generalmind.com/blog/best-procure-to-pay-software-platforms-20262

guideflow.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software2

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/source-to-pay-software2

precoro.com/blog/procure-to-pay-solutions-and-systems2

procurementmag.com/digital-procurement/top-10-procure-to-pay-p2p-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Fusion

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Fusion; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle Fusion Cloud 1Oracle Fusion Cloud (including Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud Service - ARCS) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.