Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Oracle GRC · September 2026 Edition
Oracle · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle GRC

21Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle GRC was named 4 times in Internal controls, where AuditBoard led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle GRC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Internal controls and SOXTax and compliance0%29 of 710%4under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle GRC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for organizations already deep in the Oracle ecosystem” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle GRC, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle GRC was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workiva13 of 213Not in the top three
MetricStream13 of 210Not in the top three
AuditBoard12 of 213Not in the top three
SAP GRC10 of 211Not in the top three
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management9 of 210Not in the top three
Diligent One Platform8 of 210Not in the top three
Vanta7 of 213Not in the top three
Archer7 of 210Not in the top three
LogicGate Risk Cloud6 of 210Not in the top three
SAP6 of 210Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle GRC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 21 answers that named Oracle GRC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org9
optro.ai9
gartner.com7
sprinto.com7
wifitalents.com6
worldmetrics.org6
checkthat.ai4
metricstream.com4
supervizor.com4
diligent.com3

Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming Oracle GRC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle GRC

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle GRC; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle 1Oracle GRC / Controls tools 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle GRC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle GRC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack