Every category where a model named Oracle Hyperion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	95 of 95	78%	9	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	96 of 96	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	123 of 133	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	49 of 52	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	78 of 114	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Hyperion yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Hyperion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	5	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	4	6
Kimi K2	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained12 labelsNone

Negative25 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you should generally avoid purchasing licenses for legacy on-premise software that requires heavy server maintenance.* Examples: Older versions of Oracle Hyperion (Essbase/HFM)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid "Enterprise Overkill." Solutions built for 10,000+ person global enterprises (e.g., heavy Oracle/Hyperion or SAP BPC deployments) may drown you in complexity and cost.” Kimi K2 · Financial reporting · scale prompt · hard negative

“Oracle has shifted its strategic focus to Oracle Cloud EPM, gradually phasing out major innovations and support enhancements for on-prem Hyperion products” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative

“Legacy, cube-centric EPM systems (Hyperion, BPC) are considered Gen-1 EPM systems and may struggle with complex relationships.” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Hyperion, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Hyperion was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan34 of 572Not in the top three

OneStream32 of 577Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning31 of 570Not in the top three

Vena28 of 573Not in the top three

Planful19 of 571Not in the top three

Datarails18 of 573Not in the top three

Prophix15 of 571Not in the top three

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation15 of 570Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM14 of 570Not in the top three

Cube13 of 573Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Hyperion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 57 answers that named Oracle Hyperion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cfoshortlist.com17

drivetrain.ai14

linkedin.com13

cubesoftware.com11

reddit.com11

prophix.com10

g2.com9

golimelight.com9

onestream.com8

softwareconnect.com8

110 of the 110 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Hyperion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software8

golimelight.com/blog/best-epm-software5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/epm-software5

reddit.com/r/FPandA/comments/1hcudv6/pros_and_cons_of_current_epm_software5

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-epm-software5

b-eye.com/blog/epm-platform-implementation-issues4

cfoshortlist.com/reports/epm-buyers-guide4

cfoshortlist.com/vendors/anaplan4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Hyperion

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Hyperion; a claim can dispute any of them.

Hyperion 5Oracle/Hyperion 2Legacy Oracle Hyperion (On-Premises) 1Oracle Hyperion (Essbase/HFM) 1Oracle Hyperion (On-Premise) 1Oracle Hyperion (On-Premises) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Hyperion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Hyperion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.