Every category where a model named Pulsora for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	19 of 76	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pulsora yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pulsora across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Pulsora - Best for: Enterprise ESG management - Strengths: End-to-end ESG + carbon management, advanced Scope 3 support” MiniMax M2.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · first choice

“Highly recommended for Private Equity groups and complex operating models.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“7. Pulsora — Best for End-to-End ESG Management” Kimi K2 · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“over-engineered for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) and are priced as expensive, quote-only enterprise software” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pulsora, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pulsora was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva23 of 239Not in the top three

Persefoni18 of 231Not in the top three

Novisto18 of 230Not in the top three

IBM Envizi17 of 230Not in the top three

Watershed14 of 231Not in the top three

SAP Sustainability Control Tower13 of 230Not in the top three

Sweep9 of 230Not in the top three

Position Green8 of 230Not in the top three

Greenly7 of 232Not in the top three

Diligent ESG7 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pulsora. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 23 answers that named Pulsora and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pulsora.comYour site19

guideflow.com18

gartner.com17

coolset.com15

onestopesg.com11

sopact.com10

esg-one.co9

energycap.com8

bigeasymagazine.com6

fanruan.com6

100 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Pulsora came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software18

pulsora.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software18

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software17

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools15

onestopesg.com/esg-resources/best-esg-reporting-software10

sopact.com/use-case/esg-reporting-platforms10

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison9

energycap.com/blog/sustainability-reporting-platform8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pulsora's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pulsora, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pulsora.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.