Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Quadient AP · September 2026 Edition
Quadient · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Quadient AP

13Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quadient AP was named 8 times in Accounts payable automat, where Stampli led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In accounts payable automat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quadient AP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Accounts payable automationSpend and procurement0%27 of 6025%8under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quadient AP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quadient AP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00202
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Helps finance teams digitize invoice capture, approval routing, PO matching, and vendor payments in a single connected workflow” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“A modular AP automation platform built for mid-market finance teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Verdict: Avoid unless you're already deeply integrated.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · hard negative
“Good for invoice processing, but has notable limitations in control and support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quadient AP, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quadient AP was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tipalti11 of 132Not in the top three
Stampli10 of 131Not in the top three
BILL9 of 130Not in the top three
Ramp7 of 132Not in the top three
AvidXchange7 of 131Not in the top three
Airbase5 of 130Not in the top three
Coupa5 of 130Not in the top three
Yooz3 of 130Not in the top three
Medius2 of 131Not in the top three
Melio2 of 131Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quadient AP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 13 answers that named Quadient AP and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Quadient AP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quadient AP; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quadient 3Beanworks (by Quadient) 1Quadient (Beanworks) 1Quadient (formerly Beanworks) 1Quadient AP (formerly Beanworks) 1Quadient AP / Beanworks 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quadient AP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quadient AP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quadient.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack