Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › SolveXia · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SolveXia

9Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SolveXia was named 5 times in Account reconciliation, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market20 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprise19 of 61

under the label threshold

In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SolveXia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	20 of 72	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SolveXia yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SolveXia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prioritize reputable leaders like ReconArt, SolveXia, or Hevo” Grok 4.1 Fast · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · first choice

“Emphasizes no-code automation and data transformation” Perplexity Sonar · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative

“ReconArt & SolveXia: The High-Volume Matching Engines” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SolveXia, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SolveXia was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BlackLine8 of 96Not in the top three

FloQast8 of 90Not in the top three

HighRadius7 of 90Not in the top three

ReconArt6 of 90Not in the top three

OneStream5 of 90Not in the top three

SmartStream5 of 90Not in the top three

Trintech4 of 92Not in the top three

Hevo Data4 of 90Not in the top three

AutoRek3 of 90Not in the top three

Numeric3 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SolveXia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named SolveXia and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airwallex.com6

bluecopa.com5

hevodata.com5

highradius.com5

gartner.com4

osfin.ai4

worldmetrics.org4

prophix.com3

ramp.com3

simetrik.com3

Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming SolveXia came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/best-automated-reconciliation-software-solutions6

hevodata.com/learn/top-7-data-reconciliation-tools5

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-account-reconciliation-tools5

bluecopa.com/blog/account-reconciliation-tools4

gartner.com/reviews/market/financial-reconciliation-solutions4

osfin.ai/blog/enterprise-reconciliation-software4

prophix.com/blog/the-10-best-account-reconciliation-software3

ramp.com/blog/accounting-reconciliation-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SolveXia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SolveXia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at solvexia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.