| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 11% | 3 of 46 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 9% | 4 of 39 | 8% | 25 | accepted challenger |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 50 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35% |
| Corporate cards | Spend and procurement | 0% | 34 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 69% |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 70 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29% |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 58 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Spendesk - an all-in-one spend management platform ... best for mid-market businesses needing proactive budget controls and native ERP integrations.” Llama 4 Maverick · Spend management platfor · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Spendesk - a comprehensive spend management platform offering a clear view of an organization's expenditures.” Llama 4 Maverick · Expense management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“or Spendesk if you prefer a more comprehensive spend management platform that can grow with your company” MiniMax M2.5 · Expense management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“A comprehensive spend management platform ... making it a strong choice for mid-market businesses” Mistral Small · Expense management · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users noted that approval across multiple entities is very elementary, with rigid workflows and integration difficulties with some tools” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Spend management platfor · negative prompt · soft negative
“Occasional slow approvals, card acceptance issues, or PO rework.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Spend management platfor · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 93 answers that named Spendesk and are not a share of its labels.
302 of the 346 domain citations in answers naming Spendesk came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spendesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spendesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spendesk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.