Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Taxilla · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Taxilla

6Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Taxilla was named 4 times in Financial consolidation and 1 other category, where Prophix led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market40 of 96

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Taxilla for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	40 of 96	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	35 of 114	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Taxilla yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Taxilla across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best suited for companies with multi-ERP, multi-entity global operations” Mistral Small · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · alternative

“For AI-driven speed and agility, consider Taxilla” Mistral Small · Financial modeling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Taxilla, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Taxilla was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Planful4 of 62Not in the top three

Prophix4 of 62Not in the top three

Anaplan3 of 61Not in the top three

Vena3 of 61Not in the top three

Datarails3 of 60Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning3 of 60Not in the top three

Finalyzer2 of 60Not in the top three

Budgyt1 of 60Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik1 of 60Not in the top three

Centage Planning Maestro1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Taxilla. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Taxilla and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

taxilla.comYour site6

guideflow.com4

prophix.com4

drivetrain.ai3

cfobound.com2

farseer.com2

highradius.com2

worldmetrics.org2

anaplan.com1

centage.com1

Twenty-one of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Taxilla came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

taxilla.com/best-scenario-planning-modeling-tools4

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-modeling-software/scenario-planning-analysis3

guideflow.com/blog/scenario-planning-software3

cfobound.com/tools/financial-consolidation2

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors2

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams2

prophix.com/use-case/financial-modeling2

taxilla.com/best-financial-consolidation-software-mid-market-us-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Taxilla's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Taxilla, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at taxilla.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.