Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Treasury Prime · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Treasury Prime

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Treasury Prime was named 1 time in Business banking, where Mercury led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market57 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Treasury Prime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Business banking	Treasury and cash	0%	57 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Treasury Prime yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Treasury Prime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Treasury Prime, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Treasury Prime was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kyriba4 of 50Not in the top three

Agicap3 of 51Not in the top three

Brex3 of 50Not in the top three

HighRadius3 of 50Not in the top three

Centime2 of 51Not in the top three

Bluevine1 of 51Not in the top three

CashAnalytics1 of 50Not in the top three

Cashflowy1 of 50Not in the top three

Column1 of 50Not in the top three

Float1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Treasury Prime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named Treasury Prime and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

treasuryview.com3

centime.com2

g2.com2

gartner.com2

holidaylandmark.com2

linkedin.com2

nilus.com2

rho.co2

treasury.ripple.com2

zipdo.co2

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Treasury Prime came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

treasuryview.com/en/blog/best-treasury-management-software-for-smbs3

centime.com/llm-pages/top-treasury-management-solutions2

g2.com/categories/treasury-management-systems/small-business2

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems2

holidaylandmark.com/blog/top-10-treasury-management-systems-tms-features-pros-cons-compari2

nilus.com/blog/best-treasury-management-software2

treasury.ripple.com/posts/top-10-treasury-management-systems2

zipdo.co/best/treasury-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Treasury Prime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Treasury Prime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at treasury.gov is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.