Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › US Tech Automations · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

US Tech Automations

2Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. US Tech Automations was named 1 time in Account reconciliation, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business36 of 74

under the label threshold

Mid-market14 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named US Tech Automations for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	2%	14 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for US Tech Automations yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated US Tech Automations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“US Tech Automations is best for multi-client firms and mid-size businesses” Llama 4 Maverick · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as US Tech Automations, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and US Tech Automations was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FloQast2 of 20Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online1 of 21Not in the top three

Xero1 of 21Not in the top three

AutoRek1 of 20Not in the top three

BlackLine1 of 20Not in the top three

OneStream1 of 20Not in the top three

Trintech1 of 20Not in the top three

Vic.ai1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named US Tech Automations. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named US Tech Automations and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ustechautomations.comYour site2

bluecopa.com1

chatfin.ai1

gbq.com1

jumpstartpartners.finance1

layer3labs.io1

ledgerler.com1

optimus.tech1

reddit.com1

simetrik.com1

Nine of the eleven domain citations in answers naming US Tech Automations came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ustechautomations.com/resources/blog/bank-reconciliation-software-comparison-20262

bluecopa.com/blog/floqast-alternatives1

chatfin.ai/blog/best-alternatives-to-blackline-close-management-for-automating-reconciliat1

chatfin.ai/blog/blackline-vs-floqast-vs-alternatives-finance-reconciliation-software-compa1

gbq.com/resources/avoiding-bank-reconciliation-pitfalls-common-mistakes-in-modern-accounti1

jumpstartpartners.finance/blog/reconciliation-automation-tools1

layer3labs.io/comparisons/best-bank-reconciliation-software1

ledgerler.com/blog/blackline-alternatives-for-small-business1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when US Tech Automations's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as US Tech Automations, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ustechautomations.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.