Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Veem · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Veem

6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Veem was named 4 times in Business bill pay and 2 other categories, where BILL led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business bill pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Veem for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Business bill payTreasury and cash0%22 of 690%2under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%
Contractor paymentsSpend and procurement0%42 of 830%1under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%
Cross-border payments and FXTreasury and cash0%44 of 830%1under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Veem yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Veem across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Veem is specifically optimized for foreign exchange (FX) rates, global security compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · alternative
“Veem (Best for Simple Contractor Payouts): ... Veem is a highly competitive B2B tool.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · alternative
“Vendor onboarding with controlled approvals | Veem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative
“Veem if you pay a lot of international vendors” Perplexity Sonar · Business bill pay · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Veem, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veem was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BILL4 of 62Not in the top three
Wise Business3 of 62Not in the top three
Airwallex2 of 61Not in the top three
QuickBooks Bill Pay2 of 61Not in the top three
Melio2 of 60Not in the top three
Plooto2 of 60Not in the top three
Revolut Business2 of 60Not in the top three
Deel1 of 61Not in the top three
Remote1 of 61Not in the top three
Worksuite1 of 61Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veem. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 6 answers that named Veem and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ebizcharge.com2
gartner.com2
agicap.com1
alltopbusiness.com1
cashflowpick.com1
checkthat.ai1
compensationtools.net1
contractor-of-record.com1
deel.com1
f6s.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Veem came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veem's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veem, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at veem.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.