7 categories · RankedWorkday
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 2% | 15 of 96 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19% |
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 9 of 70 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 31 of 95 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29% |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 45 of 133 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 109 of 127 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17% |
| Contractor payments | Spend and procurement | 0% | 44 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27% |
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 46 of 60 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd say Workday is the best default choice for a mid-market B2B company” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · first choice
“with SAP and Workday relevant if you anticipate scaling well beyond 500” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for: Larger mid-market companies focused on human capital management” MiniMax M2.5 · ERP systems · direct prompt · alternative
“Rippling and Workday model contractors alongside employees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contractor payments · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise ERPs (SAP, Oracle NetSuite, Workday): ... overkill and too expensive” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative
“Coupa or Workday if you use their ecosystem (good mid-market support but pricier)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 81 answers that named Workday and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
175 of the 175 domain citations in answers naming Workday came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Workday
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.