Every category where a model named Zapro AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	2%	12 of 80	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zapro AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zapro AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Precoro / Procurify / Zapro | Mid-market simplicity, fast implementation | Best size fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · scale prompt · first choice

“the newer, more user-friendly platforms (like Kodiak Hub, Zapro, and others rated 4.6\u20134.7) may serve you better” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zapro AI, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zapro AI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Precoro12 of 149Not in the top three

Coupa11 of 140Not in the top three

Gatekeeper8 of 141Not in the top three

SAP Ariba8 of 140Not in the top three

Procurify5 of 140Not in the top three

Tradogram4 of 141Not in the top three

Kissflow Procurement4 of 140Not in the top three

Jaggaer3 of 140Not in the top three

GEP SMART2 of 140Not in the top three

Ivalua2 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zapro AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Zapro AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zapro.aiYour site13

mindsprint.com10

learn.g2.com7

softwareconnect.com7

suppliergateway.com6

g2.com5

softwareadvice.com5

toolradar.com5

spendflo.com4

supplychaindesk.com4

Fifty-three of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Zapro AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapro.ai/vendor-management/best-vendor-management-software-for-smes10

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/vendor-management-software9

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-supplier-relationship-management-software7

learn.g2.com/best-supplier-relationship-management-software6

suppliergateway.com/best-supplier-management-software6

toolradar.com/blog/vendor-management-software5

softwareadvice.com/scm/supplier-relationship-management-software-comparison4

supplychaindesk.com/blog/best-supplier-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Zapro AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zapro AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Zapro 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zapro AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zapro AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zapro.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.