Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › American Express Business Checking · September 2026 Edition
American Express · 1 category · Named, not ranked

American Express Business Checking

9Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. American Express Business Checking was named 7 times in Business banking, where Mercury led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named American Express Business Checking for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Business bankingTreasury and cash0%17 of 780%7under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for American Express Business Checking yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated American Express Business Checking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best if you want a no-fee account with high APY and unlimited free transactions; Investopedia rated it best overall for 2026” Perplexity Sonar · Business banking · budget prompt · alternative
“Traditional Bank Option: American Express Business Checking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Business banking · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as American Express Business Checking, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and American Express Business Checking was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bluevine8 of 94Not in the top three
Chase Business Banking8 of 90Not in the top three
Mercury8 of 90Not in the top three
Novo7 of 92Not in the top three
Relay7 of 90Not in the top three
Axos Bank4 of 90Not in the top three
Bank of America4 of 90Not in the top three
Grasshopper4 of 90Not in the top three
NBKC4 of 90Not in the top three
U.S. Bank4 of 90Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named American Express Business Checking. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named American Express Business Checking and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

nerdwallet.com8
finder.com7
forbes.com6
airwallex.com5
found.com5
techrepublic.com5
handelsblatt.com4
investopedia.com4
ofx.com4
backbase.com3

Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming American Express Business Checking came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as American Express Business Checking

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as American Express Business Checking; a claim can dispute any of them.
American Express 3Amex Business Checking 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when American Express Business Checking's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as American Express Business Checking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at americanexpress.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack