Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Axos Bank · September 2026 Edition
Axos · 1 category · Ranked

Axos Bank

23Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Business banking for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Axos Bank for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Business bankingTreasury and cash2%10 of 780%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Axos Bank yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Axos Bank across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Often rated as the best overall business checking account, Axos offers no monthly fees, unlimited transactions, and interest on balances” Mistral Small · Business banking · direct prompt · first choice
“(Best overall per Forbes) ... Good if you want to earn interest on balances” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business banking · budget prompt · alternative
“Consider highly rated alternatives: Bluevine, Mercury, Axos, NBKC” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business banking · negative prompt · alternative
“Pick Grasshopper or Axos if you care most about yield” Perplexity Sonar · Business banking · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Axos Bank, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Axos Bank was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Mercury18 of 234Not in the top three
Bluevine17 of 236Not in the top three
Novo13 of 231Not in the top three
Chase Business Banking13 of 230Not in the top three
Relay12 of 232Not in the top three
Bank of America11 of 230Not in the top three
NBKC9 of 231Not in the top three
Grasshopper8 of 230Not in the top three
U.S. Bank8 of 230Not in the top three
PNC Bank6 of 231Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Axos Bank. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 23 answers that named Axos Bank and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

finder.com20
nerdwallet.com16
forbes.com15
airwallex.com12
handelsblatt.com11
techrepublic.com11
found.com9
business.com6
rho.co6
wise.com6

112 of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Axos Bank came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Axos Bank

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Axos Bank; a claim can dispute any of them.
Axos 4Axos Bank Business Interest Checking 2Axos Business Interest 1Axos Business Premium Savings Account 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Axos Bank's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Axos Bank, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at axosbank.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack