Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Athennian · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Athennian

111Judge labels
16First choices
25Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Entity management for enterprise buyers
Rank 1 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 39 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Athennian for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Entity managementEquity and corporate18%1 of 8715%39accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Athennian yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Athennian across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502204
GPT-5.4 mini20013
Gemini 3.5 Flash21205
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast30126
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash22026
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K212014
GLM 4.7 FlashX20002
MiniMax M2.512104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels7
Paraphrase18 labels4
Comparative28 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels3
Scale-constrained13 labels2
Negative12 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative111 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Athennian (Best Overall for Legal & Finance Collaboration) ... widely considered the gold standard for modern, cloud-native entity management” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid‑Market B2B: Athennian—AI‑powered, highly rated, and flexible for complex entity structures.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Athennian is widely recommended as the strongest fit for in-house legal teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · direct prompt · first choice
“Athennian is usually the better default pick because it tends to be the more focused entity-management-first option” GPT-5.4 mini · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Enterprise Tools: Athennian, Diligent Entities, etc., start at $15K+/year—overkill and too pricey” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Diligent Entities or Athennian if budget-constrained” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative
“"Priced for firms, not micro teams" and "doesn't have flexibility to add complex codes and logic"” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative
“More expensive than Commenda/Filejet but cheaper than traditional enterprise solutions” Kimi K2 · Entity management · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Athennian, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Athennian was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Diligent Entities79 of 11110Not in the top three
CSC Entity Management59 of 1115Not in the top three
MinuteBox31 of 1116Not in the top three
Computershare GEMS31 of 1113Not in the top three
Filejet25 of 1113Not in the top three
CT Corporation Entity Management22 of 1110Not in the top three
Corporify22 of 1110Not in the top three
Carta18 of 1112Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Athennian. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 111 answers that named Athennian and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org59
coverpin.com56
getapp.com48
g2.com46
capterra.com41
techbullion.com39
anywherer.com38
f6s.com38
athennian.comYour site34
discern.com31

396 of the 430 domain citations in answers naming Athennian came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Athennian

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Athennian; a claim can dispute any of them.
Athenian 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Athennian's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Athennian, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at athennian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack