Every category where a model named CT Corporation Entity Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	17 of 87	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CT Corporation Entity Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CT Corporation Entity Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Preferred by compliance and corporate secretarial teams for ongoing filings and hierarchy views.” Mistral Small · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strong enterprise options for high-volume legal operations across many jurisdictions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

“provides comprehensive legal entity management software and services” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Compliance teams managing ongoing filings” Kimi K2 · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Many legacy providers (such as CSC or CT Corporation) do not publish transparent pricing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CT Corporation Entity Management, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CT Corporation Entity Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Diligent Entities27 of 275Not in the top three

Athennian22 of 276Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management21 of 271Not in the top three

EntityKeeper18 of 271Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS9 of 272Not in the top three

Carta9 of 271Not in the top three

Commenda8 of 272Not in the top three

LegalX7 of 272Not in the top three

Corporify6 of 270Not in the top three

DiliTrust Governance Suite6 of 270Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CT Corporation Entity Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 27 answers that named CT Corporation Entity Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org18

coverpin.com15

capterra.com11

getapp.com11

diligent.com9

discern.com9

g2.com9

kurums.com9

techbullion.com9

wolterskluwer.comYour site9

100 of the 109 domain citations in answers naming CT Corporation Entity Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software17

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared15

capterra.com/entity-management-software11

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software11

kurums.com/best-entity-management-software-2026-comparison9

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-20269

anywherer.com/best-corporate-entity-management-software8

diligent.com/resources/blog/best-entity-management-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CT Corporation Entity Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CT Corporation Entity Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

CT Corporation 7CT Corporation (Wolters Kluwer) / Harbor Compliance 1Corporation Service Company (CSC) / CT Corporation 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CT Corporation Entity Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CT Corporation Entity Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wolterskluwer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.