Every category where a model named CSC Entity Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	20 of 87	36%	22	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CSC Entity Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CSC Entity Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	4	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative22 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels4

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want a mature enterprise governance platform with strong services support and compliance depth, start with CSC.” GPT-5.4 mini · Entity management · comparative prompt · first choice

“Other notable options include CSC Entity Management (best for secretarial teams needing jurisdictional entity inventory...)” Mistral Small · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Diligent Entities or CSC—if you need a full GRC suite or bundled registered‑agent services.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative

“Strong enterprise options for high-volume legal operations across many jurisdictions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid or proceed with extreme caution with CSC Entity Management given its poor reviews and documented issues with invoicing, missed filings, and unresponsive support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · negative prompt · hard negative

“risks service disruptions—avoid if reliable support is critical” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · negative prompt · hard negative

“Legacy Systems (e.g., Diligent, CSC Entity Management): ... can feel clunky, require heavy training, have longer implementation times, and carry higher price tags.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · scale prompt · soft negative

“avoid the bloat, rigid interfaces, and massive implementation fees of legacy enterprise systems (like Diligent or CSC)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CSC Entity Management, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CSC Entity Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Athennian59 of 7513Not in the top three

Diligent Entities52 of 7511Not in the top three

EntityKeeper38 of 757Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS30 of 751Not in the top three

CT Corporation Entity Management21 of 750Not in the top three

MinuteBox20 of 752Not in the top three

Commenda16 of 753Not in the top three

Filejet14 of 752Not in the top three

Corporify14 of 750Not in the top three

Carta12 of 752Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CSC Entity Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 75 answers that named CSC Entity Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org41

coverpin.com35

getapp.com29

techbullion.com29

capterra.com28

g2.com28

gitnux.org28

anywherer.com23

f6s.com23

diligent.com22

286 of the 286 domain citations in answers naming CSC Entity Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared34

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software31

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-202629

capterra.com/entity-management-software25

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software24

anywherer.com/best-corporate-entity-management-software23

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management20

gitnux.org/best/entity-management-software20

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CSC Entity Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CSC Entity Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

CSC 4CSC Global 2CSC (CSC Services) 1CSC Global/CSC Entity Management 1Corporation Service Company (CSC) / CT Corporation 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CSC Entity Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CSC Entity Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cscglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.