Every category where a model named MinuteBox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	3%	7 of 87	0%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MinuteBox yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MinuteBox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	3
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels4

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“MinuteBox (best overall value)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

“Modular (board portal, data room, e-filings); AI-powered; handles 150+ countries” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Smaller corporate secretarial teams: Corporify, MinuteBox, or EntityKeeper” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative

“MinuteBox — *Best for Digital Minute Books & External Collaboration*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MinuteBox, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MinuteBox was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Athennian31 of 378Not in the top three

EntityKeeper25 of 371Not in the top three

Diligent Entities24 of 373Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management20 of 371Not in the top three

Filejet14 of 371Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS14 of 370Not in the top three

Corporify9 of 370Not in the top three

Wolters Kluwer Legisway7 of 370Not in the top three

Commenda6 of 371Not in the top three

Lextree6 of 371Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MinuteBox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 37 answers that named MinuteBox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coverpin.com19

getapp.com19

minutebox.comYour site19

worldmetrics.org16

g2.com15

capterra.com14

f6s.com12

gitnux.org11

techbullion.com11

diliforce.com8

125 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming MinuteBox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared17

capterra.com/entity-management-software13

getapp.com/operations-management-software/entity-management13

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management12

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software12

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-202611

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software11

worldmetrics.org/best/legal-entity-management-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MinuteBox

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MinuteBox; a claim can dispute any of them.

Corporatek / MinuteBox 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MinuteBox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MinuteBox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at minutebox.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.