Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 53 of 60, unchanged
BILL, formerly Bill.com
2Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BILL, formerly Bill.com was named 1 time in Business bill pay, where BILL led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business58 of 66
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market31 of 98
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In business bill pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BILL, formerly Bill.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 31 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% |
Movement
Since September 2026, BILL, formerly Bill.com held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Business bill pay · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BILL, formerly Bill.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BILL, formerly Bill.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“use Bill.com/Melio for SMB vendor payments with accounting sync” Muse Glimmer 30B · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BILL, formerly Bill.com, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BILL, formerly Bill.com was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BILL, formerly Bill.com, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BILL, formerly Bill.com was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BILL, formerly Bill.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named BILL, formerly Bill.com and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
365dropship.com1
accountingseed.com1
agillink.com1
apps.xero.com1
bbb.org1
bluevine.com1
businessnewsdaily.com1
capterra.com1
doxo.com1
eleven.run1
Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming BILL, formerly Bill.com came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
bill.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BILL, formerly Bill.com takes 0% of first choices and BILL takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
bill.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BILL, formerly Bill.com takes 0% of first choices and BILL takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “bill pay platforms”
1
Position for “bill pay platform for businesses”
1
- Its company's site
- bill.com shared with BILL's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,783,039 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 72,278 · 6,684 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 11,288
- Paid Google search
- 45 searches its ads show for, about 5,920 clicks and $199,231 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 98 in business bill pay
Segment leader
32%
BILL
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow BILL, formerly Bill.com
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BILL is the company behind BILL, formerly Bill.com.ShowHide
The company
BILL is the company behind BILL, formerly Bill.com.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AP, AR, and spend & expense solution that lets you create and pay bills, manage expenses, control budgets, and get the credit your business/firm needs to grow.
- For
- Businesses & Firms
- Free plan or trial
- free trial bill.com/product/ai
- Certifications
- SOC 1SOC 2 Type IIPCI certified vendor
- Customers named
- Clif Family WineryBear RoboticsGeneration TeachBare BonesGolden RatioWagShazam AccountingHeadlight
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What BILL, formerly Bill.com's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: bill.com, bill.com/dl/pricing-for-growth-worksheet, bill.com/security, bill.com/product/ai, bill.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BILL, formerly Bill.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BILL, formerly Bill.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BILL, formerly Bill.com by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BILL, formerly Bill.com is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BILL, formerly Bill.com, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.