Every category where a model named DebtBook for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	15 of 60	0%	11	accepted challenger
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	26 of 124	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DebtBook yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DebtBook across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	3	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	4	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Modern platforms with built‑in ASC 842/IFRS 16 automation, OCR, and ERP integration (e.g., DebtBook, FinQuery/LeaseQuery, Occupier, NetLease).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for organizations needing lease and subscription compliance connected to debt, cash, and investment management” MiniMax M2.5 · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best For: State & local governments, universities, and hospitals reporting under GASB.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Organizations needing GASB 87, ASC 842, or GASB 96 compliance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DebtBook, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DebtBook was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visual Lease16 of 211Not in the top three

FinQuery14 of 217Not in the top three

Trullion12 of 210Not in the top three

NetLease9 of 210Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration8 of 211Not in the top three

Crunchafi8 of 210Not in the top three

EZLease7 of 212Not in the top three

Black Owl Systems7 of 210Not in the top three

LeaseAccelerator6 of 211Not in the top three

MRI ProLease6 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DebtBook. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 21 answers that named DebtBook and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

debtbook.comYour site17

gartner.com10

occupier.com9

softwareadvice.com9

softwareconnect.com9

blackowlsystems.com8

visuallease.com7

acquisition-international.com6

capterra.com6

finantrix.com6

Seventy of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming DebtBook came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software13

occupier.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software9

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software9

softwareadvice.com/property/lease-accounting-comparison8

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared7

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software7

acquisition-international.com/best-lease-accounting-software-of-2026-from-compliance-to-ca6

finantrix.com/buyer-guides/lease-accounting-administration-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DebtBook's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DebtBook, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at debtbook.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.