Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › LeaseCrunch · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

LeaseCrunch

16Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LeaseCrunch was named 6 times in Lease accounting, where FinQuery led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 64

under the label threshold

Mid-market10 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise11 of 52

under the label threshold

In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LeaseCrunch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	2%	10 of 60	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LeaseCrunch yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LeaseCrunch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I would recommend LeaseCrunch (Crunchafi)” MiniMax M2.5 · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Leader for mid‑to‑large enterprises prioritizing calculation accuracy and audit readiness” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · scale prompt · alternative

“Leader in accuracy/audit readiness for ASC 842/IFRS 16, targeted at mid-to-large firms.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“LeaseCrunch if audit readiness is your #1 concern” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LeaseCrunch, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeaseCrunch was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visual Lease11 of 161Not in the top three

FinQuery9 of 164Not in the top three

MRI ProLease9 of 160Not in the top three

EZLease8 of 161Not in the top three

LeaseAccelerator7 of 161Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration6 of 161Not in the top three

Trullion6 of 160Not in the top three

NetLease4 of 160Not in the top three

iLeasePro3 of 161Not in the top three

Black Owl Systems3 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeaseCrunch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 16 answers that named LeaseCrunch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com12

finantrix.com10

guideflow.com10

blackowlsystems.com9

acquisition-international.com8

g2.com8

capterra.com7

debtbook.com7

gartner.com7

saasrat.com7

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming LeaseCrunch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

finantrix.com/buyer-guides/lease-accounting-administration-software10

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software10

guideflow.com/blog/lease-accounting-software9

acquisition-international.com/best-lease-accounting-software-of-2026-from-compliance-to-ca8

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared8

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software7

trullion.com/blog/lease-accounting-software-solutions-for-asc-842-ifrs-16-2026-guide7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as LeaseCrunch

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LeaseCrunch; a claim can dispute any of them.

LeaseCrunch (now Crunchafi) 2LeaseCrunch / Crunchafi 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeaseCrunch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeaseCrunch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leasecrunch.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.