Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Fluence Technologies · September 2026 Edition

Fluence · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Fluence Technologies

6Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fluence Technologies was named 3 times in Financial consolidation, where Prophix led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business28 of 91

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 96

under the label threshold

Enterprise49 of 71

under the label threshold

In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fluence Technologies for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	24 of 96	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fluence Technologies yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fluence Technologies across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Built specifically for mid-market consolidation, with an Excel-based reporting layer but a strong statutory-grade engine underneath.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · alternative

“Fluence is built specifically to address the mid-market "consolidation gap."” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Post-M&A / High-Growth B2B” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fluence Technologies, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fluence Technologies was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vena6 of 60Not in the top three

Prophix5 of 61Not in the top three

OneStream4 of 61Not in the top three

Planful4 of 61Not in the top three

Datarails3 of 60Not in the top three

Centage Planning Maestro2 of 61Not in the top three

Fathom2 of 60Not in the top three

HighRadius2 of 60Not in the top three

Lucanet2 of 60Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fluence Technologies. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named Fluence Technologies and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com3

cfobound.com2

coefficient.io2

fathomhq.com2

fuelfinance.me2

joiin.co2

planful.com2

prophix.com2

airbyte.com1

aisdr.com1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Fluence Technologies came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors3

cfobound.com/tools/financial-consolidation2

coefficient.io/cfo-resources/financial-consolidation-tools2

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-20242

fuelfinance.me/blog/financial-consolidation-software2

joiin.co/best-financial-consolidation-software-for-20262

planful.com/best-financial-close-and-consolidation-software2

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fluence Technologies's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fluence Technologies, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fluence.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.