Every category where a model named Fraxion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Spend management platforms	Spend and procurement	2%	5 of 39	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 49%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	23 of 85	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Accounts payable automation	Spend and procurement	0%	45 of 60	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fraxion yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fraxion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Ramp and Fraxion offer the best balance of comprehensive functionality, ease of use, and scalability.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Spend management platfor · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“choose Airbase, Ramp, and one other (e.g., Fraxion, Procurify, or SAP Concur depending on ERP)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Spend management platfor · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“### 5. Fraxion - Best for: Mid-sized businesses needing proactive control” Kimi K2 · Spend management platfor · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for ERP Integration & Cost Optimization: Fraxion” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fraxion, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fraxion was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coupa13 of 192Not in the top three

Ramp10 of 192Not in the top three

Procurify8 of 194Not in the top three

Airbase6 of 192Not in the top three

BILL Spend & Expense6 of 190Not in the top three

SAP Concur5 of 190Not in the top three

Precoro4 of 191Not in the top three

Spendesk4 of 190Not in the top three

Tipalti4 of 190Not in the top three

BILL3 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fraxion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 19 answers that named Fraxion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fraxion.bizYour site17

emburse.com7

gartner.com7

procurify.com7

ramp.com6

brex.com4

learn.g2.com4

order.co4

precoro.com4

zoneandco.com4

Forty-seven of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Fraxion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fraxion.biz/blog/top-spend-management-software9

emburse.com/resources/best-spend-management-platforms7

fraxion.biz/blog/5-best-procure-to-pay-software-for-mid-market-companies-20264

fraxion.biz/blog/best-ap-automation-software-platforms4

gartner.com/reviews/market/expense-management-software4

zylo.com/blog/best-spend-management-software4

apsentra.com/best-procure-to-pay-software3

brex.com/spend-trends/expense-management/best-spend-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fraxion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fraxion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fraxion.biz is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.