Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Spendflo · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Spendflo

17Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Spendflo was named 4 times in Supplier management and 2 other categories, where Procurify led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business57 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market47 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Spendflo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	47 of 80	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	59 of 85	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	119 of 127	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spendflo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spendflo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not a source‑to‑pay suite; no RFx or reverse auctions—only operational procurement” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spendflo, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spendflo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Precoro13 of 175Not in the top three

Procurify13 of 171Not in the top three

Coupa13 of 170Not in the top three

SAP Ariba13 of 170Not in the top three

Tradogram9 of 172Not in the top three

Jaggaer5 of 170Not in the top three

Ramp5 of 170Not in the top three

GEP SMART4 of 170Not in the top three

Gatekeeper3 of 170Not in the top three

Ivalua3 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spendflo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 17 answers that named Spendflo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com7

spendflo.comYour site7

tradogram.com7

mindsprint.com5

fontsarena.com4

g2.com4

auravms.com3

doss.com3

procuredesk.com3

procurementmag.com3

Thirty-nine of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Spendflo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

reddit.com/r/procurement/comments/1gpgktb/why_are_procure_to_pay_tools_rubbish_and_crazy6

tradogram.com/blog/12-best-purchasing-software-for-small-mid-size-companies6

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/b2b-procurement-platform5

fontsarena.com/blog/critical-mistakes-to-avoid-when-selecting-a-procurement-platform4

doss.com/trends/best-procurement-platforms-for-2026-a-complete-buyers-guide-for-physical-p3

reddit.com/r/procurement/comments/1ha9ll9/best_procurement_software3

24454788.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/24454788/OM_Guide_6-Common-Procurement-Techn2

auravms.com/blogs/sap-ariba-alternatives-small-business-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spendflo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spendflo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spendflo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.