Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Invoice2go · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Invoice2go

9Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Invoice2go was named 5 times in Global e-invoicing compl and 1 other category, where Avalara led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business114 of 120

under the label threshold

Mid-market106 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Invoice2go for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	106 of 108	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%
Invoicing software	Receivables and billing	0%	83 of 86	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Invoice2go yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Invoice2go across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Trustpilot flagged this one: its rating was "unavailable due to a breach of our guidelines," and multiple users reported accounts being deactivated/closed without notice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid if you rely on timely payments or have a high-volume business.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative

“Caution Advised. Beyond general usability, there have been high-profile incidents reported involving compromised accounts and fraudulent activity.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative

“Trustpilot rating is unavailable due to a breach of guidelines, which itself is a cautionary signal” Kimi K2 · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Invoice2go, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoice2go was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FreshBooks4 of 90Not in the top three

Invoicely4 of 90Not in the top three

Invoice Simple3 of 90Not in the top three

Invoiced3 of 90Not in the top three

Xero3 of 90Not in the top three

Zoho Invoice2 of 92Not in the top three

Wave2 of 91Not in the top three

Harvest2 of 90Not in the top three

Invoice Home2 of 90Not in the top three

QuickBooks2 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invoice2go. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Invoice2go and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

trustpilot.com8

capterra.com5

bbb.org3

ca.trustpilot.com3

comparatif-pro.com3

mindsprint.com3

reddit.com3

softwareadvice.com3

apps.apple.com2

assist.biz2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Invoice2go came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

trustpilot.com/review/invoice.2go.com7

capterra.com/p/163114/Zoho-Invoice/reviews3

comparatif-pro.com/en/blog/best-electronic-invoicing-software3

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/e-invoicing-software3

trustpilot.com/review/invoiced.com3

assist.biz/general/e-invoicing-security-protecting-your-business2

bbb.org/us/ca/palo-alto/profile/social-media-marketing/invoice2go-1216-722173/customer-rev2

blog.envoyce.co.uk/9-worst-pitfalls-when-choosing-invoicing-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Invoice2go

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Invoice2go; a claim can dispute any of them.

Invoice2Go 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invoice2go's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invoice2go, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at invoice2go.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.