Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Loopio · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Loopio

15Judge labels

2First choices

4Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Loopio was named 6 times in Strategic sourcing, where Precoro led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 150

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 127

under the label threshold

Enterprise9 of 61

under the label threshold

In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Loopio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	26 of 127	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Loopio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Loopio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase14 labels2

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“consider pairing Precoro with Loopio (or Responsive) for proposal drafting and content reuse” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Mid-to-large teams that value clean UI, governance, and collaboration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best fit if your main need is RFP response management: Loopio” GPT-5.4 mini · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Loopio and Qvidian are also strong contenders” Mistral Small · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“RFPIO, Loopio, Qvidian: These start at $15K–$30K+/year and are designed for large enterprises” Kimi K2 · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Loopio, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loopio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Responsive10 of 151Not in the top three

Coupa7 of 152Not in the top three

Tradogram6 of 152Not in the top three

Market Dojo6 of 151Not in the top three

AutoRFP.ai5 of 150Not in the top three

SAP Ariba5 of 150Not in the top three

Precoro4 of 151Not in the top three

PandaDoc3 of 152Not in the top three

Workday Strategic Sourcing3 of 151Not in the top three

DeepRFP3 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Loopio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 15 answers that named Loopio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spendflo.com9

gartner.com8

softwareconnect.com8

inventive.ai6

getapp.com5

learn.g2.com5

deeprfp.com4

g2.com4

sifthub.io4

bidsparq.com3

Fifty-six of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming Loopio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

spendflo.com/blog/e-sourcing-platform9

gartner.com/reviews/market/e-sourcing-applications8

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-strategic-sourcing-software8

learn.g2.com/best-rfp-software5

deeprfp.com/blog/best-rfp-tools-comparison4

inventive.ai/blog-posts/top-rfp-software-small-businesses-startups4

gartner.com/reviews/market/rfp-response-management-applications3

getapp.com/operations-management-software/rfp/org/mid-size-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Loopio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Loopio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at loopio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.