Every category where a model named Market Dojo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	4%	7 of 127	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	27 of 85	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Market Dojo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Market Dojo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Market Dojo (Best for Fast ROI & On-Demand Sourcing) ... the perfect "stepping stone" for mid-sized companies transitioning from manual spreadsheets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“widely recognized as one of the most accessible and affordable e-sourcing platforms for small-to-midsized businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · first choice

“I’d also look at Market Dojo or Unit4 Source-to-Contract by Scanmarket” GPT-5.4 mini · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“clean, guided eSourcing with bid-sheet comparison, good for mid-size teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Market Dojo, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Market Dojo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coupa15 of 213Not in the top three

SAP Ariba13 of 211Not in the top three

Tradogram10 of 213Not in the top three

Precoro9 of 213Not in the top three

GEP SMART7 of 210Not in the top three

Ivalua6 of 211Not in the top three

Loopio6 of 210Not in the top three

oboloo5 of 211Not in the top three

Jaggaer5 of 210Not in the top three

AuraVMS4 of 213Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Market Dojo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 21 answers that named Market Dojo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com11

softwareconnect.com9

g2.com7

spendflo.com7

walkme.com7

capterra.com5

procurementvms.com5

softwareadvice.com5

guideflow.com4

kurums.com4

Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Market Dojo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-strategic-sourcing-software9

gartner.com/reviews/market/e-sourcing-applications6

spendflo.com/blog/e-sourcing-platform6

walkme.com/blog/best-strategic-sourcing-software5

g2.com/categories/strategic-sourcing4

gartner.com/reviews/market/strategic-sourcing-application-suites4

kurums.com/best-strategic-sourcing-software-2026-comparison4

procurementvms.com/procurement/best-procurement-software.html4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Market Dojo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Market Dojo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at marketdojo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.