Every category where a model named Workday Strategic Sourcing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	9%	5 of 127	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	41 of 85	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday Strategic Sourcing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday Strategic Sourcing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a mid-sized B2B company, Workday Strategic Sourcing is an excellent choice if you want an integrated financial and sourcing solution.” Mistral Small · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with Precoro or Workday Strategic Sourcing if you're already using Workday” MiniMax M2.5 · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice

“the best e-sourcing and RFP tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be Workday Strategic Sourcing” Llama 4 Maverick · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for Collaborative RFx: Workday Strategic Sourcing (formerly Scout RFP)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“more commonly positioned toward enterprise than mid-market” GPT-5.4 mini · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday Strategic Sourcing, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Strategic Sourcing was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coupa13 of 194Not in the top three

SAP Ariba13 of 192Not in the top three

Ivalua12 of 191Not in the top three

GEP SMART9 of 191Not in the top three

Jaggaer9 of 191Not in the top three

Zycus8 of 190Not in the top three

Precoro5 of 192Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement5 of 190Not in the top three

Market Dojo4 of 190Not in the top three

Zip4 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Strategic Sourcing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 19 answers that named Workday Strategic Sourcing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com10

softwareconnect.com8

procurementvms.com7

spendflo.com7

worldmetrics.org7

g2.com6

guideflow.com5

walkme.com5

zycus.com5

mindsprint.com4

Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Workday Strategic Sourcing came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-strategic-sourcing-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/strategic-sourcing-application-suites5

worldmetrics.org/best/procurement-systems-software5

gartner.com/reviews/market/e-sourcing-applications4

procurementvms.com/procurement/best-procurement-software.html4

spendflo.com/blog/e-sourcing-platform4

walkme.com/blog/best-strategic-sourcing-software4

g2.com/categories/strategic-sourcing3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday Strategic Sourcing

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Strategic Sourcing; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workday Strategic Sourcing (formerly Scout RFP) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Strategic Sourcing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Strategic Sourcing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.