Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Microsoft Dynamics GP · September 2026 Edition

Microsoft Dynamics · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Dynamics GP

10Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Dynamics GP was named 5 times in Accounting software and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market56 of 56

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In accounting software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Dynamics GP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Accounting software	Accounting and close	0%	56 of 56	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%
ERP systems	Accounting and close	0%	49 of 70	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Dynamics GP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics GP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid older, localized accounting systems (like older versions of Sage 50, MS Dynamics GP, or outdated custom ERPs)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounting software · negative prompt · hard negative

“widely seen as legacy products you should be migrating off of” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative

“Unless you are migrating, do not adopt Dynamics GP.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Accounting software · negative prompt · hard negative

“Dynamics GP/Oracle Cloud ERP can make sense, but they're usually better choices when you have a broader platform reason, not just a GL reason” GPT-5.4 mini · Accounting software · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics GP, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics GP was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Oracle NetSuite6 of 100Not in the top three

Sage Intacct4 of 102Not in the top three

SAP S/4HANA4 of 100Not in the top three

QuickBooks3 of 101Not in the top three

Xero3 of 101Not in the top three

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central3 of 100Not in the top three

Acumatica2 of 100Not in the top three

FreshBooks2 of 100Not in the top three

Odoo2 of 100Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Dynamics GP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 10 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics GP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cio.com2

clefincode.com2

cudio.com2

erpresearch.com2

flectic.com2

reddit.com2

adatasol.com1

bigideasdb.com1

cashbook.com1

cashflowpick.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Dynamics GP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cio.com/article/278677/enterprise-resource-planning-10-famous-erp-disasters-dustups-and-di2

clefincode.com/blog/global-digital-vibes/en/comparative-analysis-of-leading-erp-systems-202

erpresearch.com/en-us/erp-implementation-failure-case-studies2

flectic.com/learn/erp-failure-causes2

adatasol.com/cost-of-failed-odoo-implementation1

bigideasdb.com/most-hated-software-20261

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide1

cashflowpick.com/cash-application-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft Dynamics GP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Dynamics GP; a claim can dispute any of them.

Dynamics GP 2Microsoft Dynamics GP (Great Plains) 2MS Dynamics GP 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics GP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics GP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoftdynamicsgp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.