Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close · September 2026 Edition

Oracle · 2 categories · Ranked

Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close

25Judge labels

2First choices

5Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Best standing

3% in Financial consolidation for enterprise buyers

Rank 37 of 96 in the mid-market standing

0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business74 of 91

under the label threshold

Mid-market37 of 96

under the label threshold

Enterprise6 of 71

criticized challenger

In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	37 of 96	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	46 of 68	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“OneStream and Oracle are currently the two most discussed options due to their ability to handle complexity” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice

“is the stronger enterprise-grade option ... if consolidation complexity is high” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you should likely avoid the high-end enterprise giants (like *OneStream* or *Oracle FCCS*) due to implementation complexity and heavy cost” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneStream19 of 258Not in the top three

BlackLine14 of 256Not in the top three

Workiva9 of 251Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik9 of 250Not in the top three

Planful6 of 250Not in the top three

FloQast5 of 250Not in the top three

Prophix5 of 250Not in the top three

SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting5 of 250Not in the top three

Vena5 of 250Not in the top three

HighRadius4 of 251Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 25 answers that named Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

prophix.com12

highradius.com11

gartner.com10

cfobound.com8

guideflow.com8

maxima.ai8

onestream.com8

worldmetrics.org8

cfoshortlist.com7

oracle.comYour site7

Eighty of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams9

gartner.com/reviews/market/financial-close-and-consolidation-solutions8

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors8

maxima.ai/articles/financial-consolidation-software8

cfobound.com/tools/financial-consolidation7

guideflow.com/blog/financial-consolidation-software7

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-20246

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle FCCS 2Oracle Cloud EPM Financial Consolidation and Close 1Oracle FCCS (Financial Consolidation and Close System) 1Oracle Financial Consolidation & Close 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.