Every category where a model named Trintech Cadency for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	40 of 72	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	68 of 68	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trintech Cadency yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trintech Cadency across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels2

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose BlackLine or Trintech if you need enterprise-grade controls and a broader close process.” GPT-5.4 mini · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Trintech if you need high-volume transaction matching and financial services specialization with faster ROI” Kimi K2 · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid BlackLine, FloQast, and Trintech” Kimi K2 · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · hard negative

“Unlike the enterprise-focused Cadency (the other Trintech product), Adra is sized for companies that have outgrown basic spreadsheets” MiniMax M2.5 · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · soft negative

“BlackLine and Trintech are the "heavyweights" of the enterprise world... it will likely become "shelfware"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · soft negative

“Trintech's *Cadency* platform is built for global Fortune 500 enterprises” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trintech Cadency, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trintech Cadency was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BlackLine46 of 4822Not in the top three

FloQast27 of 485Not in the top three

Numeric21 of 484Not in the top three

OneStream19 of 481Not in the top three

HighRadius16 of 480Not in the top three

Trintech Adra13 of 482Not in the top three

Workiva9 of 481Not in the top three

ReconArt7 of 481Not in the top three

Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud5 of 481Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik5 of 480Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trintech Cadency. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 48 answers that named Trintech Cadency and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

numeric.io30

bluecopa.com22

prophix.com21

highradius.com17

ramp.com14

worldmetrics.org14

gartner.com13

maxima.ai13

satvasolutions.com12

airwallex.com11

167 of the 167 domain citations in answers naming Trintech Cadency came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

numeric.io/blog/account-reconciliation-software18

bluecopa.com/blog/account-reconciliation-tools14

prophix.com/blog/the-10-best-account-reconciliation-software14

ramp.com/blog/accounting-reconciliation-software13

satvasolutions.com/blog/best-reconciliation-software12

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/best-automated-reconciliation-software-solutions11

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-account-reconciliation-tools11

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Trintech Cadency

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trintech Cadency; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cadency 1Trintech/Cadency 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trintech Cadency's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trintech Cadency, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trintech.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.