Every category where a model named Plooto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	25 of 91	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	0%	13 of 69	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	48 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Plooto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Plooto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	3	0	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labelsNone

Paraphrase13 labels1

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the administrative burden of accounts payable and receivable, Plooto is a strong contender.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · B2B payment acceptance · direct prompt · alternative

“Plooto if you're a smaller mid-sized team mainly looking for simple AP/AR automation” Perplexity Sonar · Business bill pay · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“then upgrade to Plooto at $24/month if you need more advanced cash application features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash application · budget prompt · alternative

“Plooto (or Tipalti for payouts) can complement your acceptance platform.” MiniMax M2.5 · B2B payment acceptance · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Platforms like BILL or Plooto (initially) if budget is your *only* concern” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Plooto, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plooto was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BILL50 of 6512Not in the top three

Melio43 of 6517Not in the top three

Ramp24 of 656Not in the top three

Helcim18 of 6511Not in the top three

Stripe18 of 650Not in the top three

Tipalti10 of 651Not in the top three

QuickBooks Bill Pay9 of 653Not in the top three

HighRadius8 of 652Not in the top three

QuickBooks Payments7 of 650Not in the top three

Zoho Books6 of 652Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plooto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 65 answers that named Plooto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com31

techrepublic.com22

fitsmallbusiness.com20

factura.ai19

cashflowpick.com18

bill.com17

worldmetrics.org16

highradius.com13

nerdwallet.com13

rillion.com12

181 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Plooto came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/b2b-payments-software31

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-b2b-payment-solutions18

factura.ai/b2b-payment-platforms-small-businesses17

techrepublic.com/article/best-b2b-payment-processors16

blog.approvalmax.com/accounts-payable-software-for-small-business10

layer3labs.io/comparisons/best-accounts-payable-automation-software10

rillion.com/blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms10

alltopbusiness.com/best-b2b-payment-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plooto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plooto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at plooto.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.