Every category where a model named Prophix One for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	2%	9 of 72	0%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Prophix One yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Prophix One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prophix One and HighRadius are top choices due to their automation, AI capabilities, and integration with financial close processes.” Mistral Small · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · first choice

“Best for: Teams wanting reconciliation integrated with close, consolidation, budgeting, and reporting” Kimi K2 · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Integrated Close/Consolidation: Prophix One or OneStream” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · alternative

“Integrated close/consolidation/recon in one platform” Grok 4.1 Fast · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Prophix One, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prophix One was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Numeric15 of 202Not in the top three

FloQast14 of 203Not in the top three

BlackLine11 of 204Not in the top three

Trintech Adra10 of 202Not in the top three

HighRadius10 of 200Not in the top three

OneStream5 of 200Not in the top three

Trintech4 of 201Not in the top three

Ramp4 of 200Not in the top three

Trintech Cadency4 of 200Not in the top three

Workiva3 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prophix One. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Prophix One and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

prophix.comYour site19

highradius.com16

numeric.io15

ramp.com14

bluecopa.com11

maxima.ai6

reconciler.co6

worldmetrics.org6

airwallex.com5

financecopilothq.com5

Eighty-four of the 103 domain citations in answers naming Prophix One came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

prophix.com/blog/the-10-best-account-reconciliation-software18

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-account-reconciliation-tools15

ramp.com/blog/accounting-reconciliation-software14

numeric.io/blog/account-reconciliation-software13

bluecopa.com/blog/account-reconciliation-tools10

maxima.ai/articles/articles-account-reconciliation-software6

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/best-automated-reconciliation-software-solutions5

financecopilothq.com/best-account-reconciliation-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Prophix One

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Prophix One; a claim can dispute any of them.

Prophix 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prophix One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prophix One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at prophix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.