Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Quicken Bill Manager · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Quicken Bill Manager

6Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quicken Bill Manager was named 6 times in Business bill pay, where BILL led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business bill pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quicken Bill Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Business bill payTreasury and cash0%20 of 6917%6under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quicken Bill Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quicken Bill Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Quicken Bill Manager if you're already a Quicken user” MiniMax M2.5 · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“paying solely for bill management through its ecosystem can be costly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Business bill pay · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quicken Bill Manager, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quicken Bill Manager was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Doxo6 of 61Not in the top three
BILL5 of 60Not in the top three
Prism5 of 60Not in the top three
Melio4 of 62Not in the top three
Papaya4 of 60Not in the top three
AvidXchange3 of 60Not in the top three
Ramp3 of 60Not in the top three
Brex2 of 60Not in the top three
MoneyGram2 of 60Not in the top three
Paymentus2 of 60Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quicken Bill Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Quicken Bill Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gobankingrates.com6
thepennyhoarder.com6
money.usnews.com5
cashflowpick.com3
worldmetrics.org3
accountingseed.com2
founderscpa.com2
gitnux.org2
reddit.com2
rippling.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Quicken Bill Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Quicken Bill Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quicken Bill Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quicken Bill Manager (Standalone) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quicken Bill Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quicken Bill Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quicken.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack